, Mostafa Vahedian2
, Mostafa Vahedian2
, Elaheh Khan Babaei3
, Pouya Derakhshan-Barjoei *4
| Results: The findings of the present study showed that the average age in the group with perforation was 48.7 and in the group without perforation was 42.04. In the non-perforated group, 58.5% of the patients were male, and in the group with perforation, 82.2% of the patients were male. In terms of smoking, 29.6% were smokers in the group without perforation and 50.4% were smokers in the group with perforation. Opium consumption was about 15.6% in people without perforation and about 33.3% in people with perforation. In terms of NSAID use, the prevalence was 35.6% in the group without perforation and 27.4% in the group with perforation. PPI consumption was 46.7% in the group without perforation and 21.5% in the group with perforation. In terms of the prevalence of H.pylori infection, the prevalence in the non-perforated group was 45.2% and in the perforated group it was 30.4%. The previous history of PUD was 56.3% in the non-perforated group and 37.8% in the group with perforation. Conclusion: There was a significant difference between cigarette and opium consumption in the perforated and non-perforated groups, and PPI consumption in these two groups. In general, the prevalence of PUD was higher in males in both perforated and non-perforated types. Fuzzy results also confirmed the effect of risk factors concordance with perforation. |
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |