Volume 82, Issue 5 (August 2024)
Tehran Univ Med J 2024, 82(5): 424-430 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sarkheil M, Mohseni M, Ali Asgharzadeh A, Rasouli Bozcheloie A. Determining the diagnostic reference levels (DRL) of CT scan imaging in Saveh Hospitals: a brief report. Tehran Univ Med J 2024; 82 (5) :424-430
URL: http://tumj.tums.ac.ir/article-1-13174-en.html
URL: http://tumj.tums.ac.ir/article-1-13174-en.html
1- Department of Medical Physics, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
2- Department of Medical Physics, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran. ,Mehran.m1352@yahoo.com
2- Department of Medical Physics, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran. ,
Abstract: (17 Views)
Background: Based on the recommendation of the European Committee and ICRP, DRL values should be determined at the local, national and regional levels for CTDIvol (Computed Tomography Dose Index volume) and DLP (Dose Length Product) dose indicators. According to the radiation protection guidelines, it is essential study has determined DRL in Saveh hospitals
Methods: This study was conducted with two methods based on the results and calculations obtained from the annual Quality Control (QC) reports and the Data Collection (DC) method related to patient scans. In this study, by referring to the annual reports of each device and using radiation components during dosimetry and determining CTDIair or CTDIw, the correction factor was obtained. Using this factor and existing equations, DLP and CTDIvol were calculated based on quality control standards. The second quartile or the median was determined as DRL for head, sinus, chest and abdomen/pelvis imaging protocols and its values were compared with each other and other studies. This study was conducted in February and March 2023 in three hospitals in Saveh city.
Methods: This study was conducted with two methods based on the results and calculations obtained from the annual Quality Control (QC) reports and the Data Collection (DC) method related to patient scans. In this study, by referring to the annual reports of each device and using radiation components during dosimetry and determining CTDIair or CTDIw, the correction factor was obtained. Using this factor and existing equations, DLP and CTDIvol were calculated based on quality control standards. The second quartile or the median was determined as DRL for head, sinus, chest and abdomen/pelvis imaging protocols and its values were compared with each other and other studies. This study was conducted in February and March 2023 in three hospitals in Saveh city.
|
Results: The diagnostic reference levels of CTDIvol index were obtained in both QC and DC methods for head (32.76 and 32.36), sinus (11.73 and 9.89), chest (6.06 and 5.11) and abdomen/pelvis (11.86 and 10.56) imaging. The highest DRL values of DLP index in both QC and DC methods are for head, abdomen/pelvis, chest and sinus CT scans, respectively. In the QC method, these values were (603.99), (478.15), (187.15), and (132.65) respectively, and in the DC method, the values were (601.84), (427.76), (219.01), and (114.81) mG.cm.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study and the lack of significant difference between the DRL values of CTDIvol and DLP indicators in both QC and DC methods, it is recommended that the centers, if they have the acceptance criteria for annual quality control, can determine the DRL by referring to the device console information from the DC method. |
Type of Study: Brief Report |
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
