|
Background: With the rising survival rates among individuals with colorectal cancer, improving quality of life and reducing the risk of recurrence have become key priorities in supportive care. High-intensity interval training (HIIT), due to its pronounced effects on physical function, inflammatory markers, and tumor-related indicators, has emerged as a promising intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an eight-week high-intensity interval training (HIIT) program on serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, quality of life, and sleep quality in female survivors of colorectal cancer.
Methods: This quasi-experimental study employed a pretest-posttest control group design and was conducted from July to September 2021 at the Kosar Women’s Sports Complex in Kermanshah, Iran. Twelve female colorectal cancer survivors (mean age=55.66±4.99 years) were randomly assigned to either an experimental (n=6) or control group (n=6). The experimental group participated in a supervised HIIT program for eight weeks. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and quality of life was evaluated using the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) questionnaire. Results: Post-intervention analysis revealed a non-significant increase in CEA levels in the experimental group (mean±SD: 2.49±0.79; CI95%: 1.66-3.33; P=0.456), while the control group showed a statistically significant reduction (mean±SD: 1.04±0.22; CI95%: 0.84-1.25; P=0.044). However, significant improvements were observed in both sleep quality (mean±SD: 5.00±2.19; CI95%: 3.27-6.72; P=0.027) and quality of life (mean±SD: 77±9.40; CI95%: 84.11-88; P=0.028) within the experimental group. No significant changes were reported in the control group for either variable. Conclusion: Findings suggest that high-intensity interval training may serve as an effective non-pharmacological intervention for enhancing sleep quality and overall quality of life in female colorectal cancer survivors. Nevertheless, the effects of HIIT on biological markers such as CEA require further investigation through larger and longer-term studies. |
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |